Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
ARTICLE

Former 'tenth planet' named for goddess of discord

  • 18:28 14 September 2006
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • David Shiga
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
This Keck Observatory picture shows Eris in the centre and Dysnomia as a small dot at the 3 o'clock position (Image: WM Keck Observatory)
This Keck Observatory picture shows Eris in the centre and Dysnomia as a small dot at the 3 o'clock position (Image: WM Keck Observatory)
 

A large icy object that helped spark the debate over Pluto's status has officially been named Eris, after the Greek goddess of discord.

The object had been known as 2003 UB313 since its discovery was reported in 2005 by Mike Brown of Caltech in Pasadena, US. It is slightly larger than Pluto, which prompted Brown and others to refer to it as the 'tenth planet' and generated debate about what should be considered a planet.

Now, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) has settled on an official definition of planet, which demotes Pluto to a new category of "dwarf planets".

The IAU has now approved Brown's suggested name, Eris, for the dwarf planet formerly known as 2003 UB313. In Greek mythology, Eris caused a fight over a golden apple, which led to the Trojan War.

Goddess of lawlessness

The IAU has also approved Brown's suggested name of Dysnomia for Eris's satellite, which is about one-tenth Eris's size (see Moon discovered orbiting tenth planet). Dysnomia is the goddess of lawlessness and Eris's daughter in Greek mythology.

"Some of us felt it was quite an amusing name in view of what it actually means," says Brian Marsden, former director of the IAU's Minor Planet Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, which is responsible for keeping official lists of solar system objects. Marsden serves on the IAU committee responsible for naming dwarf planets.

Before Eris was officially named, Brown had nicknamed the object "Xena" after a television character. But he did not try to have that name officially approved, according to Tim Spahr, interim director of the MPC.

"That was just an affectionate name that was used," Spahr told New Scientist. "A lot of people name objects before they receive an official name. He didn't even suggest that for an official name."

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine