Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
ARTICLE

Solar 'superflare' shredded Earth's ozone

  • 19:33 23 March 2007
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Kelly Young
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
A solar flare much more massive than this one tore apart much of the ozone in Earth's stratosphere in 1859 (Image: Solar and Heliospheric Observatory)
A solar flare much more massive than this one tore apart much of the ozone in Earth's stratosphere in 1859 (Image: Solar and Heliospheric Observatory)
 

The largest solar flare in the last 500 years may have shredded Earth's ozone layer to a greater extent than human-made chemicals have in recent decades, new research suggests, but the effect was only temporary. If such a flare occurred today, it would likely be even more damaging to the ozone and could increase the rate of skin cancer around the world.

On 1 September 1859, the Sun expelled huge quantities of high-energy protons in a 'superflare'. The event was seen on Earth by an observer who noticed a white spot on the Sun suddenly brighten for about five minutes.

When the magnetic storm struck Earth, fires started in telegraph stations due to electrical arcing in the telegraph wires. The northern lights, or aurorae borealis, were reportedly seen as far south as Florida in the US.

This flare released 6.5 times more energy than the largest solar flare of the satellite era, which occurred in 1989. That flare was strong enough to cause a power blackout in Quebec, Canada.

Now, scientists have calculated the ozone depletion from the 1859 solar flare for the first time by studying chemical deposits in Greenland ice cores.

Acid rain

The deposits were laid down after the flare set off a series of reactions in Earth's atmosphere. For roughly two days after the flare, high-energy protons entered the atmosphere through the polar regions, channelled there by the planet's magnetic field lines.

The protons ionised nitrogen and oxygen molecules in the atmosphere, which then formed nitrogen oxides. The nitrogen oxides in turn reacted with ozone – a molecule made up of three oxygen atoms, breaking it into oxygen molecules and atomic oxygen.

This breakdown caused global atmospheric ozone levels to drop by 5%. In comparison, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other chemicals have depleted the levels by about 3% in recent years, says team member Adrian Melott, a physicist at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, US.

However, unlike CFCs and other ozone-depleting chemicals, which can persist in the atmosphere for some time, the flare-induced ozone thinning probably lasted for just four years, the researchers report. That is because the nitrogen oxides that cause the depletion eventually rain down with water or ice. Indeed, it was this acid rain that was eventually recorded in the ice cores.

Skin cancer

If such a superflare occurred today, it would likely have an even greater effect on the atmosphere, since the ozone layer is already depleted due to CFCs and other human-made chemicals.

"It certainly wouldn't be helped any," says team leader Brian Thomas, an atmospheric modeller at Washburn University in Topeka, Kansas, US.

Since the ozone layer normally blocks some of the Sun's dangerous ultraviolet radiation, a superflare would probably mean an increase in skin cancer due to the higher levels of UV light reaching the ground. The magnetic storm could also fry the electronics on many satellites and cause power outages on Earth.

Radiation sickness

Previously, another team used the ice core data to calculate that the radiation from a flare like the one in 1859 could cause acute radiation sickness – or even death – in astronauts shielded by the hull of an average spacecraft (see Superflares could kill unprotected astronauts).

The researchers say their work could have implications for hunting for life on other planets, since other Sun-like stars have been shown to have superflares. "It could be bad for critters that live there," Thomas told New Scientist.

It is not clear what causes the superflares on those stars. But if a planet larger than Jupiter is circling close to the star and causing the star's magnetic field to get twisted up, the resulting tension could be released in a massive solar flare (see Crisis, what crisis?).

Journal reference: Geophysical Research Letters (doi: 10.1029/2006GL029174, 2007)

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 4 comments on 1 page

World Destruction

By Melanie Green

Fri May 09 19:02:59 BST 2008

Is it true that we are in the world is in the middle of a major climate change due to the depletion of the ozone layer? If so are we too late?Also,is it possible for the world to explode due to rising internal temperatures of the Earth?

REPORT | REPLY

World Destruction

By Gareth

Mon May 19 21:57:03 BST 2008

Hi Melanie,

1: The world is in the middle of a very rapid climate change but it is due primarily to human made emissions of greenhouse gases not damage to the ozone layer. (The 'ozone hole' is another environmental issue in itself)

2. Not sure if we're too late or not - that's the big question and will depend on how willing politicians are to tackle this issue seriously. We'll have to wait and see on this one.

3. The internal temperature of the world would need to rise by thousands of degrees to cause the whole planet to explode. The interior of planet Earth (under the ground) is actually cooling gradually, not heating up and sometimes releases some of it's internal heat via volcanoes or other forms of geological activity. So, in a way, parts of the world sometimes explode, but thankfully not all of it!

If you meant the temperature of the atmosphere in relation to climate change, again the temp cannot rise high enough to make the Earth explode - so don't worry!

Hope these answers are helpful,

regards,

Gareth

REPORT | REPLY

Slight Issue Over Terminology

By Gareth

Mon May 19 21:29:29 BST 2008

The image displayed in this article is not of a solar flare, as stated, but of a Coronal Mass Ejection. Solar flares and CME's are different phenomena and the author is confusing the two. Solar flares are explosions that occur in the solar corona (the white misty stuff you can see during a total solar eclipse) that can release high quantities of uv and x-ray radiation.

The photograph in the article is taken in visible white light - not UV or x-ray - and displays a coronal mass ejection which is an enormous cloud of gas that is expelled from the solar corona and travels outward through the solar system.

Just to confuse matters, CME's sometimes originate from the same location and shortly after or before a solar flare and sometimes are not associated with them at all.

The 1859 event was not a singular event in itself but a series of sequential events over several days that included several solar flares and then an enormous Earth directed CME that travelled out from the Sun and hit Earth, causing a geo-magnetic storm. Essentially what happened was that the CME was powerful enough to overwhelm the Earth's magnetic field (the same field that makes your compass point North) and some of the electrically charged particles in the CME where able to penetrate the Earth's atmosphere to the depth of the ozone layer, causing chemical reactions that destroyed large quantities of ozone. Some of the particles penetrated even deeper, to ground level, and caused shorting in electrical equipment causing fires and power failures.

REPORT | REPLY

Slight Issue Over Terminology

By Gareth

Mon May 19 21:37:08 BST 2008

- one extra point regarding the image. This image is made using a coronagraph, which obscures the light from the solar disk and allows the faint light from the corona iselft to be viewed. Solar flares appear much closer to the surface of the Sun (denoted by the white circle). As you can see from the photo, the coronagraph obscures the surface and the lower depths of the corona from view (the disk has a greater diameter than the apparent diameter of the Sun at this distance - as the white ring is considerably inside the outer edge of the disk) and thus renders solar flares completely unviewable in this image.

REPORT | REPLY

There are 4 comments on 1 page

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine