Space shuttle astronauts will attempt an unprecedented in-orbit repair of key Hubble Space Telescope (HST) instruments during the servicing mission scheduled for August 2008. The repairs, along with the addition of two new instruments, will make Hubble 90 times as powerful as it was after its flawed optics were corrected in 1993.
In October 2006, NASA announced plans to carry out a fourth and final servicing mission for Hubble, in which it would install two new scientific instruments and replace the observatory's batteries and gyroscopes. But previously the agency has not said whether it would attempt a difficult repair of two key instruments that have broken down in recent years.
The Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS), which died in January 2007, was Hubble's highest resolution camera and its most-used instrument. And the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS), which failed in 2004, measured light spectra in the ultraviolet, allowing it to gauge the distance and composition of distant galaxies.
Now, the space agency says it will try something never attempted in the three previous Hubble servicing missions – a finicky electronics repair job in space, where astronauts have the challenge of doing everything while wearing bulky spacesuit gloves.
Without the repair mission, Hubble would likely die by 2011, when its last functioning gyroscope is expected to fail. But with new gyroscopes and batteries installed on the upcoming servicing mission, HST should last at least until 2013, and possibly into the 2020s.
Two powerful new instruments will be installed on the mission. The Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) will allow Hubble to see fainter and more distant galaxies than anything it has seen before, shedding light on the early universe.
This could allow Hubble to see galaxies so far away that we see them as they were just 400 million years after the big bang, says Sandra Faber of the University of California in Santa Cruz, US, a member of the panel that recommended that NASA carry out the final servicing mission.
To date, the most distant galaxies seen by Hubble appear to be from about 800 million years after the big bang, which occurred 13.7 billion years ago. "The universe evolves extremely rapidly at these early times, so a [time] difference like this makes a huge difference in the structure and size of galaxies [that exist in those eras]," Faber said at a press conference on Tuesday at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Austin, Texas, US.
Another new instrument, the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS), can obtain ultraviolet light spectra of very faint, distant objects such as quasars – huge black holes that are glowing as they gobble up surrounding gas. COS can measure much fainter objects than STIS, although STIS can get more detailed spectra of the objects it can see.
With its new instruments, Hubble will be 90 times as powerful as it was supposed to be when first launched – it will be like having 90 of the original Hubble Space Telescopes, astronomers say. The improvement comes from a combination of increased sensitivity and wider fields of view, allowing Hubble to see 900 galaxies where its original instruments would have revealed only 10. HST will be about 60% more powerful than it was right after the third servicing mission, before ACS and STIS failed.
The most challenging part of the mission will be to repair ACS and STIS. "We're going to do something that has never been done in space," said John Grunsfeld, NASA's lead spacewalking astronaut for the servicing mission.
Both repairs involve astronauts unfastening dozens of tiny screws to replace some circuit boards on each of the instruments – all while wearing bulky spacesuit gloves. Such a feat has never been attempted before in space.
The astronauts will also have to cut through metal layers to reach the circuit boards, creating sharp edges that could be hazardous to spacesuits. In the case of ACS, Grunsfeld may not even be able to see the screws he is working with because of the way the instrument is angled inside HST.
Grunsfeld has been practicing this tricky manoeuvre in a "neutral buoyancy laboratory" – a water tank designed to simulate the weightlessness of orbit. "Amazingly ... training in a neutral buoyancy lab in the spacesuit, I've been able to do this," he said.
He added that he is willing to put his life on the line for the risky mission. "I still believe that Hubble science and the Hubble programme is still something worth risking my life [for], and I know I have six other crew members who believe that as well," he said.
NASA science chief Alan Stern said although the mission is still scheduled for August 2008, it could slip because of the launch delays the space shuttle has been experiencing in its missions to assemble the International Space Station. "Our watchword in all of this is safety," he said, adding that if the servicing mission needed to wait until October or even later to make sure the shuttle is safe, then NASA would wait.
During the mission, new insulation blankets will be wrapped around Hubble to make up for cracks in existing insulation and a fine guidance sensor will be added to help HST point itself precisely. Astronauts will also install a "soft capture mechanism" to allow a future robotic mission to grab onto Hubble at the end of its lifetime so that it can safely re-enter the atmosphere and crash into the ocean.
By L Bartlett
Tue Jan 08 22:30:27 GMT 2008
If there is danger of tearing of the spacesuit while working inside th cut sections, why not wear a a tough, reinforced protector over the outside of the suit on the fore-arm?By Emery Premeaux
Wed Jan 09 09:23:56 GMT 2008
I ike this.. Like BMX armor..By Luve
Thu Feb 07 20:25:42 GMT 2008
This comment has been found to be in breach of our terms of use and has been removed.By Mike Perry
Wed Jan 09 16:43:49 GMT 2008
If they have a sharp edge after the cut I would think a specially designed adhesive tape over the cut would mitigate the sharp edge. Duct tape in space!By D Barton
Wed Jan 09 06:32:58 GMT 2008
In the context of a Huckabee tilt at the presidency it is incredibly inspiring to read of Americans willing to die for the sake of scientific knowledge. Truly humbling.By Mike Gale
Wed Jan 09 21:53:31 GMT 2008
Yes.By Alton Moore
Thu Jan 10 03:34:31 GMT 2008
I had written to Johnson Space Center some years ago to suggest that we just send some astronauts on a 1-way trip to Mars. Not just to have one look at the place and expire, of course, but to live for as long as possible, say a year or so. The science would be invaluable future trips, and I for one would certainly volunteer. They sent me a polite letter that the govt. Wasn't in the business of endangering the astronauts or something along those lines. :-)By Tr
Wed Jan 09 06:46:56 GMT 2008
Robotic arms, virtual reality, advanced optics etc should be able to accomplish this. Why not to develope a unit capable of doing the precision phase of the task? Cutting the hole and attaching the unit to the Hubble would be done by the astronauts. Thorough testing, practicing and even real time controlling could be done at/from the NASA space centre. Well, it's too late now, but why clinging to those bulky gloves?By Jeeten
Wed Jan 09 07:24:52 GMT 2008
No,the technologies you claim cannot even cook carrots in an earthly kitchen.They acnnot even dream of that right now,as the badwidth required for monitoring the activities of robots are just starting to exist. I know,i'm a robot builder.By Craig Fiddick
Wed Jan 09 07:49:02 GMT 2008
But if the feed was only needed over a short distance and not sent back to Earth then bandwidth is not such a major issue. The feed only needs to reach the astronaut in space - not to a land based station. That way they could have a similar setup that doctors use for microsurgery on earth?By Emery Premeaux
Wed Jan 09 09:14:45 GMT 2008
Robots are poor choices for deployments and upgrades of satelite technology.All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.
18:53 05 September 2008