Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
ARTICLE

Astronomers begin search for 'vanishing' stars

  • 20:41 09 May 2008
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • David Shiga
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Some black holes announce their births with brilliant light shows, but others may tiptoe into existence (Illustration: NASA)
Some black holes announce their births with brilliant light shows, but others may tiptoe into existence (Illustration: NASA)
Tools
digg thisAdd My YahooAdd Google Reader reddit submitNewsvineciteulike submit
 

Astronomers have started monitoring about a million massive stars to see if any suddenly vanish, seemingly without a trace. Such a disappearing act would support a theory that some massive stars simply implode when they die, rather than exploding in brilliant supernovae or gamma-ray bursts.

As a massive star ages, it accumulates iron in its core. Eventually, this iron core grows so massive that it is crushed by its own gravity, forming a black hole.

Sometimes the process is accompanied by a supernova, when the star's outer layers explode outwards to produce a brilliant flash of light at visible wavelengths. In rare cases, black hole births are even more spectacular, with the star firing out powerful jets of high-energy radiation as it dies – a phenomenon known as a gamma-ray burst.

But as many as half of black hole births may happen more stealthily, with no explosion to mark the event. A new survey led by Christopher Kochanek of Ohio State University in Columbus, US, may detect these events by watching massive stars suddenly wink out.

'No guarantees'

The survey, which uses the 8.4-metre Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) on Mount Graham, Arizona, US, took its first images in early 2008. It is monitoring about 1 million red supergiant stars – massive stars in the final stage of their lives – in 30 nearby galaxies.

The team plans to take images of the galaxies twice per year, watching for the sudden disappearance of the red supergiants. By watching 1 million stars, the team hopes to catch about one stellar death per year in their survey, which will last five years.

"There's no guarantee that you'll find these things – because it could just be that they all do a supernova at some level," Kochanek told New Scientist. "But that's no reason not to give it a try."

Giant outbursts

Stan Woosley of the University of California in Santa Cruz, US, who does theoretical studies of stellar deaths, agrees. "My own view is that it is impossible to make a black hole without some sort of electromagnetic display," he told New Scientist.

But perhaps there are cases where the radiation comes out in the form of X-rays or gamma rays, he says, rather than the visible light astronomers normally look for when searching for supernovae. "In any case, it is worth looking."

If a star seems to disappear, the team will try to confirm the formation of a black hole by looking for X-rays emitted by stray bits of matter falling into the black hole, Kochanek says.

In addition to clarifying what proportion of black holes are born without fanfare, the survey may also detect rare, giant outbursts from massive stars that are close to going supernova. Such an outburst in the 1840s temporarily made a star called Eta Carinae the second brightest star in the sky.

Journal reference: Astrophysical Journal (in press)

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 26 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

Dyson Spheres?

By Nick

Sat May 10 00:43:44 BST 2008

Fans of British SF author Peter F. Hamilton will recognise the significance of this.

REPORT | REPLY

Dyson Spheres?

By Dh

Sat May 10 01:40:06 BST 2008

No dyson around red giants, think about it.

REPORT | REPLY

Dyson Spheres?

By Greg

Sat May 10 06:26:10 BST 2008

Dyson spheres would require a stable star with a long lifespan. Most importantly if such a thing were to exist we would not see it at all since the sphere would block all of the radiation from the star it surrounds.

REPORT | REPLY

Dyson Spheres?

By Nick

Sat May 10 08:06:28 BST 2008

Precisely, which is why I refer to Hamilton's writings, and not Freeman Dyson's ;)

In 'Pandora's Star' a Dyson Sphere is erected around a star system containing an aggressive alien species by an external agency.

It's a good read!

REPORT | REPLY

Dyson Spheres?

By Popoyd

Mon May 12 15:40:01 BST 2008

And The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy too. The Krikkit are the same :D

REPORT | REPLY

Dyson Spheres?

By Charles

Sun May 11 05:48:16 BST 2008

Or indeed Bob Shaw

REPORT | REPLY

Dyson Spheres?

By Acoyauh

Mon May 12 15:56:12 BST 2008

Setting aside the fact that such a sphere would never exist in practice... Yes :)

REPORT | REPLY

By Anon

Sat May 10 06:31:42 BST 2008

"By watching 1 million stars, the team hopes to catch about one stellar death per year ..." would they therefore predict no red giants visible in the universe in about a thousand years?

REPORT | REPLY

Maths?

By Mader

Sat May 10 12:00:01 BST 2008

First, you wanted to say "about a milion years". Funny that you complaint of somebody other math.

Second, they look only on subset of all accessible red giants - these, whom are on edge of dying and are sufficiently massive, not just any red giant.

This number - milion stars - have nothing to do with total number of red giants in universe.

REPORT | REPLY

Maths?

By Koalabeer

Sat May 10 16:36:12 BST 2008

Well, Mader and anon, it's 1,000,000 red giants in 30 nearby galaxies- a piffling amount of the universe. To look at it another way, if the project finds (ahem, I mean loses) one star in 10 years, then there's probably something of the order of 100,000,000...... Red giants imploding with a whimper that just disappeared with no-one to mourn them.

Ain't it tragic?

REPORT | REPLY

Maths?

By Mick

Sun May 11 14:14:18 BST 2008

Um wouldn't that be 1 million years to lose all the stars? In that time maybe more giant stars would be created...

Doesn't matter how many stars there are in the universe. Their prediction is a rate of demise, 1 in a million per year.

REPORT | REPLY

Maths?

By William Smith

Sun May 11 22:34:36 BST 2008

This survey is of red supergiant stars which only last from 100,000 to one million years before they collapse into a black hole so in one million years all the stars being surveyed will indeed have disappeared.

Red supergiants form when supergiants have fused all their hydrogen into helium. The supergiants themselves last from 10 to 50 million years so the red supergiant phase is only a small fraction of their total lifespan. In a million years a small proportion of the supergiants currently visible will have become red supergiants so the number of red supergiants visible will be about the same.

REPORT | REPLY

Time Dilation. . .

By Tom

Sat May 10 08:41:26 BST 2008

They'll have to wait a long time...

REPORT | REPLY

There are 26 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
SUBSCRIBER LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine