Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
ARTICLE

Hubble snaps ghostly ribbon of light

  • 00:00 02 July 2008
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Rachel Courtland
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
The Hubble Space Telescope has captured a close-up of the expanding remnants of a supernova observed in 1006 CE (Image: NASA/ESA/Hubble Heritage Team)
The Hubble Space Telescope has captured a close-up of the expanding remnants of a supernova observed in 1006 CE (Image: NASA/ESA/Hubble Heritage Team)
 

Medieval skywatchers got to see a star explode, but modern-day astronomy buffs get all the pretty pictures of its ghostly remains.

Hubble has captured a close-up of the remnant of a supernova that exploded in the Milky Way over 8000 years ago, and whose light reached Earth on 1 May 1006. The explosion is one of the brightest in recorded history and was visible with the naked eye.

The delicate-looking remnant is actually part of a shock wave from the stellar explosion. The roiling remains are still expanding, moving at a clip of about 10 million kilometres per hour.

Hubble's image is mostly a composite made from the visible light emitted by hydrogen atoms in the remnant.

Bright parts of the twisting ribbon are places where the shock wave from the explosion lies edge-on with our line of sight.

The remains of the supernova are faint in visible light, but astronomers have produced stunning images in the X-ray part of the spectrum.

View a gallery of other shimmering supernova remnants (move your mouse over the images to read the captions).

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 9 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

Supernova Didn't Explode In 1006

By Ross Fraser

Wed Jul 02 07:21:34 BST 2008

The article states that "Hubble has captured a close-up of the remnant of a supernova that exploded in the Milky Way on 1 May 1006." As the supernova was nearly 7,000 light-years from Earth, it may have been seen on 1 May 1006 but it exploded many millennia earlier -- about 6,000 BCE.

REPORT | REPLY

Supernova Didn't Explode In 1006

By Michael Marshall, Online Editorial Assistant

Wed Jul 02 12:07:21 BST 2008

Thanks Ross, you're quite right of course. I've amended the article accordingly.

REPORT | REPLY

Size Of The Remnant

By Anonymous

Wed Jul 02 11:25:48 BST 2008

I notice that there are stars visible in front of the remnant, this seems to me to indicate that the object itself is very very large. Has it swallowed any stars in it's neighbourhood, and it if has, what will have become of them?

REPORT | REPLY

Size Of The Remnant

By Anon

Wed Jul 02 15:08:16 BST 2008

The object is indeed very large, and as such the matter within it is very very diffuse. So that in itself poses no threat to nearby stars.

REPORT | REPLY

Ancient, Not Mide

By Jonathan W. Logan

Wed Jul 02 14:55:22 BST 2008

I believe that they would have been Ancient, not Medieval, skywatchers.

Excellent article and fascinating photo!

Thanks -

Jonathan W. Logan

Portland, Oregon

REPORT | REPLY

There are 9 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine