Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
ARTICLE PREVIEW
This article is only available to subscribers of New Scientist magazine. Subscribe now for full-text access to all content on this site.

Probing the true nature of black holes

  • 04 October 2007
  • Michael D Lemonick
  • Magazine issue 2624

What do we really know about black holes? That may sound like an odd question. Aren't black holes and all their well-known attributes - the singularity, the event horizon, the ability to swallow light and matter - just part of the furniture of astrophysics? Strangely, no. Astronomers know of massive bodies that fit the bill, but for now black holes remain largely theoretical. So much so that some researchers even claim that they don't exist.

The debate over the existence of black holes has been rumbling on since about 1939, when Albert Einstein published a paper arguing that for a black hole to form, a collection of stars would have to orbit each other faster than the speed of light, which special relativity prohibited. That turned out to be wrong, but the point is that black holes are so weird, Einstein didn't believe in them - even though ...

The complete article is 2739 words long.
Password Login
username:
password:
 help
Athens Login
Athens users ONLY
help
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
New Scientist Full Access is available free to magazine subscribers

Subscribe today at only USD $5.95 for your first 4 issues and get New Scientist, the world's leading science & technology news magazine delivered direct to your door every week

As a magazine subscriber you will benefit from instant access to:

  • the full text of this article
  • all Full Access content on newscientist.com
  • 15 years of past issues of New Scientist via the online Archive
Subscribe now