Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
ARTICLE PREVIEW
This article is only available to subscribers of New Scientist magazine. Subscribe now for full-text access to all content on this site.

Hackers' dirty tricks threaten to distort elections

  • 13 October 2007
  • Jessica Marshall
  • Magazine issue 2625

FOR more than an hour on US election day in 2002, the lines of a "get-out-the-voters" phone campaign sponsored by the New Hampshire Democratic Party were clogged by more than 800 prank calls.

In the 2006 election, 14,000 Latino voters in Orange county, California, received letters saying that it was illegal for immigrants to vote and doing so could result in their deportation.

Shameful though these examples are, at least those responsible - Republican party officials, consultants and campaign staff - were traced and charged or shamed by the press. In future, however, tracing dirty tricks and bringing perpetrators to account might not be so easy.

The internet, touted for its potential to democratise the political process (New Scientist, 9 March, p 28), may in fact do the opposite. It allows people to anonymise and broaden the scope of such dirty tricks, and paves the way for new scams, say ...

The complete article is 713 words long.
Password Login
username:
password:
 help
Athens Login
Athens users ONLY
help
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
New Scientist Full Access is available free to magazine subscribers

Subscribe today at only USD $5.95 for your first 4 issues and get New Scientist, the world's leading science & technology news magazine delivered direct to your door every week

As a magazine subscriber you will benefit from instant access to:

  • the full text of this article
  • all Full Access content on newscientist.com
  • 15 years of past issues of New Scientist via the online Archive
Subscribe now