Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
ARTICLE PREVIEW
This article is only available to subscribers of New Scientist magazine. Subscribe now for full-text access to all content on this site.

Commentary: Why we don't need 'scientism' and 'religionism'

  • 12 April 2008
  • Lawrence Krauss
  • Magazine issue 2651

IN ONE of those accidental juxtapositions that make life interesting, in the same week I went from co-moderating a seminar on science and religion with a leader of the John Templeton Foundation, which funds research that aims to connect science and religion, to sharing a platform with Richard Dawkins at the annual conference of the American Atheists organisation.

These events got me thinking about the "culture wars" I had heard much about from my co-moderator. He used a term I have only heard over the past two to three years: "scientism". It is often used pejoratively to describe a philosophical position that extends beyond the simple presumption of science that empirically verifiable physical effects have physical causes, to the more expansive claim that the empirical world reflects all of reality. It includes, by inference, the idea that because there is no evidence for either divine purpose or spiritual direction these ...

The complete article is 641 words long.
Password Login
username:
password:
 help
Athens Login
Athens users ONLY
help
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
New Scientist Full Access is available free to magazine subscribers

Subscribe today at only USD $5.95 for your first 4 issues and get New Scientist, the world's leading science & technology news magazine delivered direct to your door every week

As a magazine subscriber you will benefit from instant access to:

  • the full text of this article
  • all Full Access content on newscientist.com
  • 15 years of past issues of New Scientist via the online Archive
Subscribe now