What do you call an absence of darkness? Dark matter is supposed to be spread throughout the universe, but a new study reports a spiral galaxy that seems to be empty of the stuff, and astrophysicists cannot easily explain why.
In the outer regions of most galaxies, stars orbit around the centre so fast that they should fly away. The combined mass of all the observable inner stars and gas does not exert strong enough gravity to hold onto these speeding outliers, suggesting some mass is missing.
Most astronomers believe that the missing mass is made up of some exotic invisible substance, labelled dark matter, which forms vast spherical halos around each galaxy. Another possibility is that the force of gravity behaves in an unexpected way, a theory known as modified Newtonian dynamics, or MOND.
In the spiral galaxy NGC 4736, however, the rotation slows down as you move farther out from the crowded inner reaches of the galaxy. At first glance, that declining rotation curve is just what you would expect if there is no extended halo of dark matter, and no modification to gravity. As you move far away from the swarming stars of the inner galaxy, gravity becomes weaker, and so motions become more sedate.
The rotation measurements only stretch 35,000 light years out from the galactic centre, which is not far enough to confirm that first impression. So a team of astronomers in Poland developed a more sophisticated analysis.
Joanna Jalocha, Lukasz Bratek and Marek Kutschera of the Polish Academy of Science in Krakow have found a way to splice the rotation curve together with another measurement: the density of hydrogen gas far from the galactic centre.
According to their combined mathematical model, ordinary luminous stars and gas can indeed account for all the mass in NGC 4736.
"If this paper is correct, then this galaxy contains very little or no dark matter," says astrophysicist Jürg Diemand of the University of California, Santa Cruz, US, who is not a member of the team. "That is surprising."
Diemand says numerous other techniques – including studies of how galaxies move inside clusters and measurements of the big bang's afterglow – all show evidence for dark matter.
So could the new analysis be faulty? "One really needs excellent data to pull this off," says Stacy McGaugh of the University of Maryland in College Park, US, an expert in galaxy formation and evolution. "I'm afraid my grumpy first impression is that I just don't buy it."
McGaugh points out that other galaxies have shown declining rotation curves, but later observations have always shown that beyond a certain distance, they flatten out, which can't be explained by ordinary gravity from visible stars and gas. "If we believe this decline, it seems like the exception and not the rule," he says.
Even then, one exceptional dark-matter-less galaxy would be a great puzzle. "The current picture is that galaxies form inside of dark matter halos," Diemand told New Scientist. The dark matter's gravity attracts ordinary gas, which can then coagulate into stars.
"It is unclear how one would form a galaxy without a dark halo, or how one could remove the halo without destroying the galaxy," says Diemand. "A galaxy without dark matter really does not fit into our current understanding of cosmology and galaxy formation."
Nor can galaxies with declining rotation curves be easily explained by MOND, says McGaugh. So for now, it seems that some of our missing mass is missing.
Cosmology - Keep up with the latest ideas in our special report.
Journal reference: Astrophysical Journal (forthcoming)
By Roy G. Reid
Tue Mar 11 19:19:59 GMT 2008
NGC 4736 rotation indicates to me that it lacks a black hole to dialate time to any significant degree. Gravatational time dialation could distort our observation of rotational rates in galaxies resulting in miscalculations that look like the galaxy is spinning to fast in the outer regions.By Mr. Jamahl Peavey
Thu Jun 26 14:35:14 BST 2008
The problem is conceptual. Most cosmological theories including General Relativity were developed before we had technology like Hubble and deep space probes. If we continue to teach this branch of science as if the current theories were developed beyound ous soalr system then we will continue to have problems. Classical physics was abandoned in the early 1900's by quantum physicist. Now we are paying the price unitl then science grow as an expansion of knowledge not abandonment.All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.
20:00 03 July 2008
