Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
Astronomy
ARTICLE

Black hole defends its heavyweight title

  • 07:03 22 February 2008
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • David Shiga
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
The heaviest known black hole produced by the collapse of a star resides 1.8 million light years from Earth in the dwarf galaxy IC 10 (Image: Adam Block/NOAO/AURA/NSF)
The heaviest known black hole produced by the collapse of a star resides 1.8 million light years from Earth in the dwarf galaxy IC 10 (Image: Adam Block/NOAO/AURA/NSF)
 

The heaviest black hole formed from the collapse of a single star weighs as much as 33 Suns - double the previous record, new measurements confirm.

Black holes come in a range of sizes, from "supermassive" behemoths weighing billions of Suns to "stellar-mass" objects weighing a few times the Sun's mass.

These stellar-mass black holes form when a massive star dies, sending its outer layers exploding outwards in a supernova and collapsing its core into a black hole. There are limits to how massive the objects can become, based on the mass and chemical composition of the parent star.

The previous record holder is a black hole in the nearby galaxy M33. Called M33 X-7, it was measured to have 16 times the Sun's mass.

In late 2007, astronomers led by Andrea Prestwich of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, US, suggested a black hole called IC 10 X-1 was even heftier, with between 24 and 33 times the Sun's mass.

But the result, which was based on the apparent orbit of a nearby companion star, was uncertain. That's because the orbit was deduced from repeating dips in the brightness of X-rays coming from the black hole's vicinity. Astronomers suspected the dips occurred when the companion star periodically passed in front of a disc of hot, X-ray emitting matter spiralling into the black hole, but there was no evidence to prove it.

Now, astronomers Jeffrey Silverman and Alexei Filippenko at the University of California, Berkeley, US, have confirmed the result by measuring the companion star's motion using spectra taken by the 10-metre Keck I telescope in Hawaii, US.

Weight loss

Their observations suggest the black hole weighs between 23 and 33 solar masses (the figure is uncertain because the mass of the companion star is not known precisely).

Just how massive can such stellar-mass black holes get? Stars can be born with more than 100 times the mass of the Sun, but over time they shed some material into space. The amount they lose depends on their chemical makeup – even the biggest stars can barely produce a 16-solar-mass black hole if they are born with a composition similar to the Sun's.

Stars low in elements heavier than hydrogen and helium, however, cast off material less efficiently and could therefore have up to 42 solar masses available to form a black hole when they die, says astrophysicist Stanford Woosley of the University of California, Santa Cruz, who was not involved in either study.

As it turns out, the nearby dwarf galaxy IC 10, which hosts the black hole, contains very few "heavy" elements.

Puzzlingly bright

Roy Kilgard of Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut, US, a member of the earlier study by Prestwich, says heavy stellar-mass black holes could explain some puzzlingly bright X-ray sources seen in other galaxies.

The "ultra-luminous" sources are 10 to 100 times brighter in X-rays than typical stellar-mass black holes, leading some to suggest they are actually a separate class of "intermediate mass black holes". The middleweight black holes are thought to weigh in at hundreds or thousands of times the mass of the Sun and give off X-rays as they swallow matter.

The X-ray sources could instead be hefty stellar-mass black holes – such as IC 10 X-1 – that are undergoing especially bright outbursts of X-rays, Kilgard says.

There are probably many other stellar-mass black holes in this mass range that have eluded detection until now because they are farther away and harder to study, Kilgard says. "I expect in the coming years we'll identify many more of these things," he told New Scientist.

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 6 comments on 1 page

What Will Happen 2012

By Dr. Pyriel Alexander Pesic

Fri Feb 22 16:58:24 GMT 2008

Hello there brother or sister, i want you to know that the armageddon people are talking about which will happen 2012 will never come. Instead jesus christ will arrive in spaceships. I have seen jesus from a picture and i know that this event it will be gladly be welcomed by people. Thanks

REPORT | REPLY

What Will Happen 2012

By Polemos

Sat Feb 23 20:55:48 GMT 2008

What the heck does the ET Jesus need humans for?

What if he is a galactic pet shop keeper?

REPORT | REPLY

What Will Happen 2012

By Stan Munsey

Wed Jun 11 08:58:50 BST 2008

We are told our how Jesus will come back..it's in the Bible. As for black holes and other such phenenoma.. They are what they are..as is everything God created.. Let's just be ready and on his good side..as we wait for his return_

REPORT | REPLY

What Will Happen 2012

By Enthralled Peasant

Sat Feb 23 23:21:53 GMT 2008

Man - somehow this stuff has got on the wrong side of the event horizon!

REPORT | REPLY

What Will Happen 2012

By Shireen

Sun Mar 02 22:56:08 GMT 2008

If Jesus is a deity, why would he need to arrive in a spaceship? It just defeats the object really...

REPORT | REPLY

Black Holes

By Stan Munsey

Wed Jun 11 09:01:50 BST 2008

Makes you wonder if the recent explosion of a star far way from any galaxy..had anything to do with a black hole...

REPORT | REPLY

There are 6 comments on 1 page

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine