Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
Comets and Asteroids
ARTICLE

Science : Mystery asteroid was eaten by fire

  • 26 October 1996
  • From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
  • Erik Stokstad
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
 

IN the summer of 1908, an object from space created a tremendous explosion over Tunguska in central Siberia. Most scientists believe the object was a rocky asteroid—yet no crater or debris has ever been found. Now a Russian scientist has come up with new calculations that strongly support the asteroid theory and confirm what others had suspected: that the heat from the explosion consumed the fragments of the asteroid, leaving only microscopic debris.

Until three years ago, many scientists believed that the object must have been a comet—which would have exploded high above the Earth and done less damage than an asteroid. But that theory was dealt a serious blow in 1993, when Christopher Chyba, now at Princeton University, Kevin Zahnle of the NASA Ames Research Center in California, and others, created computer simulations to explain the pattern of trees blown down by the explosion. Their calculations of the explosion's force suggested that the body involved was a stony asteroid about 40 metres in diameter, travelling at 15 kilometres per second (New Scientist, Science, 16 January 1993, p 16).

Now Vladimir Svetsov of the Institute for Dynamics of Geospheres in Moscow has re-examined the American team's data to estimate the heat of the explosion. He found that the air around the body would have been heated to 15 000 °C, enough to melt the surface of the rocky fragments. Droplets would then be stripped off the fragments until nothing remained. "It was very similar to a nuclear explosion," says Svetsov (Nature, vol 383, p 697).

The microscopic debris was probably scattered over a wide area by the turbulent wake of the asteroid, says Svetlov. The droplets could explain the origin of spherical particles found in tree resin near the impact site, which are thought to be extraterrestrial.

 
From issue 2053 of New Scientist magazine, 26 October 1996, page 16
 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine