Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
Solar System
ARTICLE

Volunteers asked to help find dead spacecraft on Mars

  • 20:09 12 May 2008
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Hazel Muir
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
The HiRISE instrument on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has already spotted spacecraft on the surface of Mars. These images show the rover Opportunity close to Mars's Victoria Crater in 2006 (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
The HiRISE instrument on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has already spotted spacecraft on the surface of Mars. These images show the rover Opportunity close to Mars's Victoria Crater in 2006 (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
 

Scientists have invited the public to trawl high-resolution images for signs of NASA's Mars Polar Lander, which went silent on arrival at Mars in 1999. Finding the wreckage might explain why the mission failed.

"If we can find the Mars Polar Lander and be convinced we understand what we're looking at, it might provide some clues as to what went wrong," says Alfred McEwen of the University of Arizona in Tucson, US. "There could be lessons there that are applicable to future landers."

The Mars Polar Lander was supposed to study the Martian climate as well as soil and ice close to the planet's south pole. But mission controllers lost contact with the probe when it landed. An investigation suggested it probably smashed onto the surface at high speed because the engines that should have slowed the craft's descent shut down too quickly.

Scientists thought they saw the dead lander in images taken by the Mars Global Surveyor satellite in 2000, but these turned out to be a mirage. Now images taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter are offering another chance for the probe to be found.

Southern summer

In mid-2007, an instrument called the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) on the orbiter snapped sharp images of about half of the likely area where the failed lander touched down. "This was also the southern summer on Mars, so the site was well illuminated," says McEwen, who leads the HiRISE team.

Now, HiRISE software developer Guy McArthur, also at the University of Arizona, has invited the public to scan these images for signs of the Mars Polar Lander. It's a huge challenge because although there are only 18 images, each of them is enormous – typically 1.6 billion pixels.

"If your computer screen is 1000 by 1000, that means you need 1600 screenshots to view one image," says McEwen. "On the HiRISE team, we haven't put much effort into looking for this – we're too busy with other things."

The lander certainly won't be easy to spot. "We just don't know exactly what it will look like," says McEwen. He estimates that any spacecraft features that might be visible – the lander, its heat shield or the backshell with a parachute attached, if the parachute actually opened – will only be a few pixels across.

Years gone by

And the local landscape is troublesomely speckled with bright and dark features roughly the same size as the spacecraft components. "It's a terrible place to look for things like this," says McEwen. "And years have gone by, so some dust will have settled – it may not stand out now."

However, keen volunteers can take some tips on what to look for from Tim Parker at

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, who has analysed HiRISE images of other spacecraft components on Mars.

NASA is hoping for a better outcome on 25 May, when its Phoenix Mars Lander is due to touch down on Mars. The lander uses similar technologies to the Mars Polar Lander, but its design has been thoroughly tested for any flaws.

Mars – The Red Planet is full of surprises; learn more in our continually updated special report.

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 8 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

Mechanical Turk?

By Nick

Tue May 13 08:51:36 BST 2008

It sounds like a job for Mechanical Turk, not amateur volunteers.

REPORT | REPLY

Mechanical Turk?

By 0xcdcdcdcd

Tue May 13 16:22:02 BST 2008

Bear in mind that the example image in the article is misleading - moving rovers can be spotted be comparing pairs of images, but that's not going to work for picking out a crash site.

REPORT | REPLY

Analysis

By Steve

Tue May 13 13:22:34 BST 2008

Wouldn't some sort of pre analysis by a software tool highlight areas where there are some anomalous pixels outstanding in order to let people concentrate on these?

They could then split the image up and send out parcels, so that people don't have the whole 1600 screen fulls to examine, but maybe just one or two.

Send duplicates out obviously, and collate the results, the ones where multiple people flag something of interest can then be examined by an expert.

REPORT | REPLY

Analysis

By Jonclarke

Wed May 14 02:14:02 BST 2008

If it were as simple as using software it would have been tried - and maybe it has been. The problem with all automated search programs is that you have to know what it is that is anomalous before you can design the search program. To look for it. We don't know what MPL might look like.

Is it a crater, the heat shielf, backshell, parac hute, the spacecraft itself more or less intact, or scattered debris? Are we looking for anomalies in pattern, intensity, or colour? Or all of these in combinaation? What if the anomaly is subtle? Or something unexpected?

In such a situation the human eye and mind is much better than software. So it is a great idea to unlease hopefully thousands of enthusiasts on the images.

REPORT | REPLY

Analysis

By Steve

Wed May 14 10:54:40 BST 2008

To identify anomalous you first have to identify nomalous.

That could be done by analysing an area of the surface where the lander definitely isn't.

The problem with the apparently unstructured approach to asking for volunteers that they have taken is that all the volunteers might check the same section of an image, and other sections might be ignored. Not to mention the massive number of false positives that they will have to deal with.

You'll note that I didn't suggest that software alone would find the lander, merely that it might identify areas of the image of more interest and also co-ordinate the process of using the volunteers effectively.

REPORT | REPLY

Analysis

By Anon

Wed May 14 12:52:56 BST 2008

You've hit the nail on the head here - I think the number of false positives that get flagged will be enormous.

Distinguishing a few pixels of lander from the myriad other natural features around is not a trivial task.

(- take a look at the HIRISE images of the Viking and Pathfinder landers on the surface of Mars for comparison)

REPORT | REPLY

Where's Waldo

By A Frequent Reader.

Tue May 13 16:06:30 BST 2008

It's like Where's Waldo for Astronomers!! :-)

REPORT | REPLY

There are 8 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine