Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
Solar System
ARTICLE

First Phoenix images reveal 'quilted' Martian terrain

  • Updated 07:44 26 May 2008
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Ivan Semeniuk, Pasadena
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Polygonal cracks resemble a quilted pattern in the soil of Mars's northern plains (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
Polygonal cracks resemble a quilted pattern in the soil of Mars's northern plains (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
Is the bright white object in the distance the lander's protective backshell? (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
Is the bright white object in the distance the lander's protective backshell? (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
Images reveal that Phoenix successfully unfurled its solar panels (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
Images reveal that Phoenix successfully unfurled its solar panels (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
One of Phoenix's feet is seen firmly planted on the ground (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
One of Phoenix's feet is seen firmly planted on the ground (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
Polygonal patterns adorn the ground near NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander. Similar patterns form in the icy ground in Earth's arctic regions (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
Polygonal patterns adorn the ground near NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander. Similar patterns form in the icy ground in Earth's arctic regions (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
 

NASA's Mars Phoenix lander has unfurled its solar panels and transmitted its first images of the planet's northern plains back to Earth, revealing a remarkably flat and strangely patterned landscape.

Throughout the images, there is ample evidence of the "polygons" that orbital images hinted should be present at the landing site.

The polygons are defined by trough-like boundaries, likely created by the repeated expansion and contraction of subsurface ice. As seen through Phoenix's eyes, the polygons give the landing site a quilt-like appearance, characterised by low bumps and shallow dips.

All the pictures seen so far show an area that is outside the "digging area" of the lander's robotic arm, but principal investigator Peter Smith of the University of Arizona in Tucson, US, expressed optimism that the interesting features evident in the terrain would continue closer to the lander, where Phoenix can scoop samples for detailed examination.

"This is a scientist's dream," said Smith.

Wind-scoured site

If Phoenix manages to sample a trough, it will probably find traces of "a complex history" that could relate to the movement of water vapour to and from an icy layer thought to lie just below the soil's surface, Smith told New Scientist.

Phoenix is designed to dig down to the ice and search for traces of organic residue that might indicate whether this part of Mars could have been habitable in the past.

Smith also noted that the soil around the lander looks granular, "like gravel", which suggests a wind-scoured place where the fine red dust - so common at other landing sites - has been carried away on the Martian breeze.

In one image, a bright white object is clearly visible in the distance protruding towards the horizon line (see image below right).

Team members did not reveal their guesses as to what the object could be, but there is speculation here that it could be the lander's protective backshell, which separated from Phoenix along with its parachute less than a minute before touchdown. The object will likely be imaged at higher resolution and at different Sun angles, which may help solve the mystery.

Critical deployment

The images began streaming down at about 1900 PDT on Sunday (0300 GMT on Monday), courtesy of the Mars Odyssey spacecraft, which made a return pass over Phoenix's landing site after earlier relaying news of the lander's safe arrival at 1653 PDT (0053 GMT on Monday).

After deploying its solar panels and stereo camera approximately 15 minutes after landing, Phoenix executed a pre-programmed sequence of images designed to help engineers assess its health.

The pictures clearly show the unfolded solar panels and one foot of the lander planted firmly on the Martian surface. The images sparked a round of cheering as they flooded into the mission control area of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, US.

The solar arrays are nearly as critical to the success of the mission as the landing itself. Without them, the spacecraft could only survive an estimated 34 hours on battery power. Engineers were elated when they saw the dust-free condition of the solar arrays, said Ed Sedivy, Phoenix programme manager for Lockheed Martin, which built the spacecraft.

Maximise power

The lander's own onboard instruments indicate that it is sitting nearly level, with a tilt of no more than 0.25°. Had Phoenix ended up with a significant tilt in the wrong direction, it would have reduced the amount of solar power available to science experiments.

Data relayed to Earth during the spacecraft's descent indicate it performed a "pirouette" manoeuvre, as planned, so that its panels opened along an east-west axis to maximise power.

"We rehearsed all of the problems, and none of them occurred," Phoenix project manager Barry Goldstein told reporters, clearly relieved at what appears to have been a remarkably smooth landing.

One notable divergence from textbook perfection was the opening of the lander's parachute 6.5 seconds later than anticipated. This ultimately caused Phoenix to touch down about 25 kilometres eastward of its expected destination, at a site near the outer edge of its projected landing ellipse.

While this leaves engineers with a puzzle to solve about why the chute deployed late, it is not expected to affect the science that Phoenix will return, because different points within the landing ellipse are expected to be virtually identical to one another.

Human missions

The landing marks NASA's sixth success in seven attempts to land on Mars since Viking I touched down in July of 1976. But this impressive success rate belies genuine concerns that NASA managers had about the pulse thruster landing system that Phoenix employed during its final descent.

Prior to this evening, NASA's recent successes – including Mars Pathfiner in 1997 and the two Mars Exploration Rovers in 2004 – have all bounced to the surface of the Red Planet encased in inflatable air bags.

Phoenix and future missions, including the more ambitious Mars Science Laboratory, were designed to land with thrusters, considered a must for heavier payloads – and for any future attempt to send astronauts on Mars.

"The way we're going to land humans on Mars is with propulsive systems and landing legs," said Ed Weiler, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate.

The most powerful camera ever sent to the Red Planet, the HiRISE camera aboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft, will attempt to image the Phoenix lander from space at about 0600 PDT (1400 GMT) on Monday.

Astrobiology - Learn more in our out-of-this-world special report.

Mars Rovers - Mars is full of surprises; learn more in our continually updated special report.

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 53 comments on 4 pages
1  | 
2  | 
3  | 
4
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

"what's That" Pic????

By Sean

Mon May 26 04:40:05 BST 2008

Any thoughts on what the white thing in the distance is?

REPORT | REPLY

"what's That" Pic????

By Emre

Mon May 26 05:47:35 BST 2008

That's a Martian. Those inquisitive little buggers all over that planet, hopefully they will stay out of the way so that Phoenix can probe the Martian soil for signs of water/primitive life without disturbance.

REPORT | REPLY

"what's That" Pic????

By Rob

Fri May 30 03:36:33 BST 2008

Oh shoot.....that's me. I thought I was out of the picture, but I guess not.

Dang it. I always ruin the pics on other planets.

REPORT | REPLY

"what's That" Pic????

By Steve

Mon May 26 06:15:46 BST 2008

Perhaps its a wedge of ice pushed up as the ice expands?

REPORT | REPLY

"what's That" Pic????

By Marvin The Martian Writes. . .

Mon May 26 09:02:02 BST 2008

It's part of a crashed alien spacecraft.

REPORT | REPLY

"what's That" Pic????

By Gary

Mon May 26 10:31:36 BST 2008

Looks like the Beagle 2 lander to me (no wonder nobody could find it). ;)

REPORT | REPLY

"what's That" Pic????

By Rob

Mon May 26 13:35:52 BST 2008

It's the obelisk from 2001 A Space Odessy

REPORT | REPLY

"what's That" Pic????

By Barry

Mon May 26 16:47:12 BST 2008

It is where all my odd socks have gone. Just how does my washing machine do it, and why doesn't NASA investigate ? Ir would be cheaper and quicker than rockets.

REPORT | REPLY

"what's That" Pic????

By Jforiska

Mon May 26 19:00:14 BST 2008

It's obviously a sign post of some sort. It probably says, "Drill here."

I imagine Amoco has already been there and is planning on gouging us for Martian Gas too.

REPORT | REPLY

"what's That" Pic????

By Ozzir Guy

Tue May 27 00:51:56 BST 2008

It's the Golden Arches. McDonalds is everywhere these days

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Marc

Mon May 26 05:00:43 BST 2008

Too bad NASA didn't attach a tiny mobile rover to check out the neighborhood; or even zoom lens might have helped.

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Charles

Mon May 26 06:57:54 BST 2008

There is no money for such frivolities with a war on terror and a war on drugs to finance.

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Wolfy

Mon May 26 10:29:46 BST 2008

WHAT? please dont raise that charles its a first class pair of chesnuts, "war" is something you dotopeople not concepts... For sure terro is bad and possibly the criminals whoare involved with the wholesale of drugs need pursuing, but ultimately knowledge of where we are and where we came fromis a better pursuit for us thantrying to eliminate each other and filling the pockets of the arms mongers

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Gaz

Mon May 26 11:04:47 BST 2008

I think (hope) Charles was being sarcastic. ...

1 more reply »

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Lance

Mon May 26 20:19:52 BST 2008

Charles, through sarcasm, I'm sure was simply saying what most intelligent species think. The fact that modern humans appear to be outnumbered by neantertals, (Bush, etc) does not diminish the great things we do as a species. ...

2 more replies »

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Ben Eastment

Mon May 26 22:24:01 BST 2008

Time for a humour upgrade dude.

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Andorin

Mon May 26 11:08:21 BST 2008

Can we please just celebrate this landing without discussing your ignorance of world history and economics?

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By God I Am The

Mon May 26 15:35:51 BST 2008

Oh yeah... I knew that it would end up in revealing that yankees funded this program with the revenue of war :)

Come clean :) ...

4 more replies »

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Dtfgsjkdfrofrv Lhcvl

Tue Jun 03 02:53:34 BST 2008

This comment has been found to be in breach of our terms of use and has been removed.

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Jean

Mon May 26 20:17:50 BST 2008

I think Charles had his tongue in his cheek

REPORT | REPLY

Stuck In One Place.

By Marc

Mon May 26 20:33:53 BST 2008

Thanks for the input, however off topic it might seem (financial concerns are a given in any very expensive project). I'd like to know if either of these options where considered, are viable, and technologically possible.

REPORT | REPLY

And The Descent?

By Jamie Jones

Mon May 26 05:48:10 BST 2008

...not to sound like we're not impressed, but wouldn't also have been fantastic to have had a camera shooting while it made it's descent through the atmosphere?

But it IS pretty special.

REPORT | REPLY

And The Descent?

By Nick F

Mon May 26 08:09:14 BST 2008

Phoenix did have a camera to capture images during the descent (and a microphone, too).

However, due to a subsystem fault identified after the craft had been assembled, it was intentionally switched off, as it may have interfered with the landing procedure.

REPORT | REPLY

And The Descent?

By Al_in_doylestown

Mon May 26 14:49:47 BST 2008

Does that mean that the mike may be switched back ON at some point? One of the biggest thrills for me about the Titan mission was hearing the wind whistling past the lander from its onboard microphone.

But no matter -- Phoenix has landed safely! Talk about a thrill!

REPORT | REPLY

And The Descent?

By Nick F

Mon May 26 21:42:25 BST 2008

Good question - I'm afraid I don't have the answer for it.

As I understand it, operation of the descent imager and mic during landing could have jeopardised the spacecraft. However, it's hard to see how switching the mic one when Phoenix is nearing the end of its 90 sol mission could do any harm.

Listening to the winds of Mars truly would be a magical thing.

REPORT | REPLY

And The Descent?

By Speilberg

Tue May 27 11:47:41 BST 2008

My $500 camcorder has been dropped in water, covered in sand, knocked off a table who knows how many times and is still working after five years. They can have it for the next mission if they want.

REPORT | REPLY

There are 53 comments on 4 pages
1  | 
2  | 
3  | 
4
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine