Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
Solar System
ARTICLE

Phoenix team struggling to collect Martian soil

  • 23:45 09 June 2008
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Rachel Courtland
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
The first sample collected by Phoenix's robotic arm seems be too big (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona/Max Plank Institute)
The first sample collected by Phoenix's robotic arm seems be too big (Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona/Max Plank Institute)
 

After running into trouble collecting samples of Martian soil, the Pheonix lander will try to use its robotic arm on Tuesday to sprinkle small amounts of soil on the lander's science instruments.

On Saturday, Phoenix unloaded a scoopful of Martian soil on the first of eight compartments on the spacecraft's Thermal and Evolved-Gas Analyzer (TEGA) instrument. But sensors indicated little soil reached its target – a tiny cylindrical oven designed to heat up the soil to analyse its composition.

A screen above the instrument was supposed to filter small bits of soil so it could be funnelled into the oven. But the lander's first scoop may have been too heavy to get through the 1 mm-wide openings in the screen.

"It looks like we got much more soil than we're use to working with, and it might just have clogged the screens," said TEGA co-investigator William Boynton of the University of Arizona in Tucson, US, at a press conference on Monday.

Dribbling in small amounts of soil into the next TEGA compartment might be able to circumvent this problem, a feat team members may try on Tuesday.

Fall through

Their plan is to turn on an instrument on the underside of the scoop that is designed to grind up ice. That will produce vibrations that could drive larger clumps of soil to the top of the scoop – the way shaking a cereal box causes smaller crumbs to fall to the bottom of the box.

Then, the lander's arm will tilt the scoop – in small steps – to try to unload the larger clumps, before sprinkling the remaining soil in the instrument.

Each TEGA screen is at a 45° angle, so dropping a small bit of soil on the highest point of the screen may allow some fine soil particles to separate out on the incline and fall through to the oven.

The results of the 'sprinkle test' may arrive as early as Tuesday, says Doug Ming of NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, US.

Small shift

After Saturday's delivery, some Phoenix mission members speculated that a vibrator inside the first TEGA compartment, designed to knock small bits of soil into the oven, might not be functioning.

But photos of the trap doors released on Monday suggest the vibrator did shift the soil, though little entered the oven.

"The soil has actually moved, but it hasn't moved very far," said Boynton. Large clumps of the soil, combined with the large overall size of the scoop, may be weighing on the vibrator and preventing it from separating out the sub-millimetre-sized particles that are needed.

Part of the problem seems to be the soil, which seems to exhibit an unusual level of clumpiness. Researchers are not quite sure why the clumps exist, but they suggest a small amount of moisture, salt, or even some electrical interaction between soil particles may be responsible.

The lander has already gathered a new scoop of soil, which it will try to sprinkle slowly on top of another instrument, the Microscopy, Electrochemistry, and Conductivity Analyzer (MECA), which holds several microscopes and a wet chemistry laboratory.

Mars Rovers - Mars is full of surprises, learn more in our continually updated special report.

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 15 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

Moisture?

By Robert Wilkinson

Tue Jun 10 01:00:06 BST 2008

Water ice should sublime when exposed to the Mars atmosphere within several hours. How come the clumpiness can still be attributed to water moisture if it takes them so long to collect the samples? I suppose the material deposited on the grill is even now still "clumpy", how can this unexpected property be attributed to any moisture at all as researchers mention in this article.

REPORT | REPLY

Sub Millimeter Particles?

By Dm

Tue Jun 10 02:02:52 BST 2008

It seems a bit odd that the test requires soil particles less than a millimeter across - is that going to be representative of the soil and crystals found? Did NASA actually try the excavation and testing of real frozen soil on earth?

REPORT | REPLY

Did The Test This On Earth First?

By Danny D

Tue Jun 10 02:56:31 BST 2008

Did they even bother trying this out on earth? sounds like there is some moisture in the soil which is making it clump together. But even still why only 1mm holes? I mean they are digging soil - not dust or sand?

REPORT | REPLY

Did The Test This On Earth First?

By Lindsay

Wed Jun 11 05:38:25 BST 2008

The ovens are only 1mm across The 1mm screen is supposed to only let through grains small enough to fit inside of the ovens. They are tiny! As a guess this is probably due to power limitations. It takes only a small amount of energy to heat a small volume to high temperature.

It is hard to understand how the clumpiness of the soil could be put down to moisture. The atmospheric pressure is too low to allow water to exist in a liquid form. Perhaps H2O gas from subliming ice in the sample could affect the soil. Perhaps electrostatic effects would be a better explanation.

REPORT | REPLY

Did The Test This On Earth First?

By Anonymous

Thu Jun 12 22:06:03 BST 2008

"Perhaps electrostatic effects would be a better explanation."

Maybe. But there are many other equally intriguing possibilities. One is that the soil particles achieve their (apparently or unexpectedly enhanced) cohesion from a microscopically small-scale structure, such as how certain clays clump. And where there is clay-like minerology, there's automatically a host of intriguingly complex possibilities. The water can still be there in the particles, chemically bound, without suffering from immediate evaporation upon exposure to the atmosphere.

And clay has been implicated as a possible "scaffold" for the rudimentary biochemical steps leading to life...

That white stuff looks very intriguing too...what if it's not "merely" salt?

REPORT | REPLY

Did The Test This On Earth First?

By Anonymous

Thu Jun 12 21:52:12 BST 2008

Dm and Danny D, vis: "Did they even bother trying this out on earth?"

Do you really think that they WOULDN'T have tested their system in a terrestrial environment which is as close an analog to the Martian conditions they expected to find? In a place nobody had yet examined up close?

These are intensely-reviewed missions. By SCIENTISTS. Scientists don't make mistakes THAT stupid.

You can honestly bet their bottom dollar they went to very harsh "Martian-like" places on Earth to figure out the best strategy for collecting soil.

BTW: The reluctance of the soil to fall through a millimeter mesh is a POSITIVE observation that tells us about its possible characteristics and it's cohesion and so on.

Welcome to the real world, at the interface between the known and the unknown, where there is always something wonderfully unexpected to be LEARNED.

Nice to know they've now managed to fill one of the ovens with this intriguing soil...Can't wait to hear what they come up with!

REPORT | REPLY

There are 15 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine