Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
Comets and Asteroids
ARTICLE

Comet brightens mysteriously by a factor of a million

  • 22:04 25 October 2007
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Maggie McKee
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Comet 17P/Holmes brightened by a factor of a million in about 36 hours (Image: Richard Hill/Loudon Observatory)
Comet 17P/Holmes brightened by a factor of a million in about 36 hours (Image: Richard Hill/Loudon Observatory)
 

A comet usually too faint to be seen with the naked eye has brightened by a factor of a million since Tuesday, suggesting its surface may have cracked open and expelled clouds of dust and gas. Astronomers are scrambling to observe the strange object, which is likely to fade in the coming days and weeks.

Comet 17P/Holmes, which orbits the Sun every seven years on a path that takes it from the distance of Jupiter's orbit to about twice that of Earth's, is usually 25,000 times too dim to be seen with the naked eye. But since 23 October, it has brightened by a million times and now resembles a bright yellow star.

"This is equivalent to the planet Saturn suddenly becoming as bright as the Full Moon," David Morrison, senior scientist at the NASA Astrobiology Institute in Moffett Field, California, US, wrote in an email newsletter.

Comets do sometimes show extreme changes in brightness. They are thought to occur when the Sun's heat vaporises newly exposed ice on the comet, blasting dust off its surface. Sunlight reflecting off the dust increases the comet's brightness.

Fresh ice

So it is possible that a crack has opened up on the comet's nucleus, which is less than about 3 kilometres across, exposing fresh ice to the Sun.

This is not the first time the comet has been caught brightening. In fact, it had brightened to become faintly visible to the naked eye when it was discovered by an observer named Edwin Holmes in 1892. It faded, then brightened again the following year before returning to obscurity.

Astronomers observed it during its close passes with the Sun in 1899 and 1906, then lost it again until 1964, when Brian Marsden, former director of the Minor Planet Center at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Massachusetts, US, correctly predicted its position.

"Since then, it's been behaving well – until now," says Marsden.

Comet Holmes can be found in the constellation Perseus.

Comets and Asteroids - Learn more about the threat to human civilisation in our special report.

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 10 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

Wow Marvellouse

By Astrowan

Fri Oct 26 20:33:36 BST 2007

We hope these comet will so bright likely comet Hale-Bopp in 1997, because i said that is because these comet lay in constellation Perseus likely comet Hale-Bopp

REPORT | REPLY

If I Wanted To Say Hello. . .

By Duaneman67

Wed Oct 31 02:13:02 GMT 2007

If I wanted to say hello, hello, hello...Is there anybody out there...I just might figure out a way to increase a comets brilliance by about a million times...

REPORT | REPLY

If I Wanted To Say Hello. . .

By Anonymous

Mon Dec 31 20:08:57 GMT 2007

This comment has been found to be in breach of our terms of use and has been removed.

REPORT | REPLY

If I Wanted To Say Hello. . .

By Anonymous

Mon Dec 31 20:09:54 GMT 2007

You have a problem with scale. This is paltry Solar System stuff. If you are trying to get attention over interstellar distances, the near-million-fold increase in brightness of this comet may sound stupendous, but it is like seeing a firefly go off next to a nuclear blast.

Besides, this comet was so incredibly faint to begin with that a million-fold blaze-up is still ridiculously faint, even by the standards of the Solar System. TYPICAL long-period comets - say like Hale-Bopp, for example - increase in brightness by factors of many MANY BILLIONS. Nobody but us who can view their splendor against a NIGHT SKY AWAY FROM OUR BLAZING SUN is likely to notice them. Our most advanced extraterrestrial astronomer neighbors, if they exist, would merely have noted yet another faint example among zillions of such cometary poofs near stars under their observation. But if they can detect truly bright cometsw (like Hale-Bopp) they'd already have noticed the far more interesting object attending our star (and much brighter than Comet Holmes): the planet we call Earth...and they'd likely already have noticed that it is inhabited.

REPORT | REPLY

If I Wanted To Say Hello. . .

By Anonymous

Mon Dec 31 20:16:52 GMT 2007

Apologies for the double-post, but this interface leaves much to be desired. One gets an "error" message inviting one to try again, so one tries again...only to find that every attempt to do as prompted simply posts more copies.

REPORT | REPLY

If I Wanted To Say Hello. . .

By Anonymous

Mon Dec 31 20:20:52 GMT 2007

This comment has been found to be in breach of our terms of use and has been removed.

REPORT | REPLY

If I Wanted To Say Hello. . .

By Anonymous

Mon Dec 31 20:22:50 GMT 2007

Sheesh!!!!!

REPORT | REPLY

Aliens?

By Aaron

Thu Nov 01 21:17:12 GMT 2007

Could this be a way that some other civilization on another planet near the comet could project it off course?

REPORT | REPLY

There are 10 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine