Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
Cosmology
ARTICLE

Gamma-ray mission may detect dark matter

Movie Camera
  • 20:40 27 May 2008
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • David Shiga
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
A computer animation illustrates GLAST's launch and deployment (Courtesy of NASA)
A simulation shows what the ever-changing gamma-ray sky might look like to NASA's GLAST observatory (Courtesy of NASA)
GLAST will scrutinise the sky in poorly-explored regions of the gamma-ray spectrum (Illustration: NASA)
GLAST will scrutinise the sky in poorly-explored regions of the gamma-ray spectrum (Illustration: NASA)
 

A new NASA satellite with powerful gamma-ray vision is set to launch on 3 June. It will observe the deaths of massive stars, probe the gamma-ray sky for unknown objects, and might even pin down the nature of the mysterious dark matter that pervades the universe.

The $700 million Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST) is set to launch into low-Earth orbit at 1145 EDT (1645 GMT) from Cape Canaveral, Florida, US. It carries a gamma-ray telescope of unprecedented sensitivity and a monitor that can detect radiation from violent cosmic events called gamma-ray bursts.

The mission will provide the first detailed survey of the sky in a largely unexplored part of the energy spectrum of gamma rays, the highest-energy form of radiation.

The observatory's Large Area Telescope (LAT) is sensitive to gamma rays with energies between 20 mega-electronvolts (MeV) and 300 giga-electrovolts (GeV). The 10 to 100 GeV range is mostly invisible to ground-based telescopes and was poorly sampled by GLAST's predecessor, the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory.

"History tells us when you open up a new band for exploration of the electromagnetic spectrum, there are new discoveries," said GLAST chief scientist Steven Ritz of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, US, at a GLAST press briefing at Goddard in 2007.

Annihilating WIMPs

The spectrum around 100 GeV offers the possibility of an especially big breakthrough – the chance to identify the nature of dark matter. Dark matter is an invisible substance that outweighs ordinary matter in the universe and has so far only been detected by its gravitational influence on ordinary matter.

The most popular explanation says that dark matter is made of exotic elementary particles that rarely interact with ordinary matter. A zoo of such weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) have been proposed, such as neutralinos and axions, but Earth-based experiments have so far failed to confirm their existence.

WIMPs are expected to annihilate and release gamma rays when they hit one another. When GLAST opens its eyes to the sky, it might see bright spots due to clumps of dark matter sprinkled throughout the galaxy. Such clumps are predicted by theory, but whether GLAST will be able to detect them is highly uncertain.

It depends on exactly what the dark matter is made of – some kinds of WIMPs would produce a stronger signal than others – and on how well GLAST can distinguish a dark matter signal from other sources of gamma-rays, such as the debris from a supernova.

Black hole evaporation

"The burden of proof is very high on a big discovery like this – you have to show that your signal is not due to some other astrophysical background," Ritz said. For about half of the kinds of dark matter particles that theorists envision, the signal may be too weak to distinguish from more mundane sources, he added.

While the potential for a dark matter detection is uncertain, GLAST is bound to provide a wealth of information on some of the universe's most violent events. These gamma-ray bursts can put out more energy in a matter of seconds than the Sun will over its entire lifetime. Most of the bursts are thought to result from the collapse of massive stars and from collisions between neutron stars, while the origins of others are still mysterious.

The GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) is sensitive enough to detect around 200 gamma-ray bursts each year, about twice the rate seen by NASA's Swift satellite, a gamma-ray burst observatory that launched in 2004. GLAST can see gamma rays across a much wider spectrum of energies than Swift, which will give scientists a more complete view of these events.

There is also an outside chance that GLAST could observe gamma rays from the explosion of microscopic black holes. According to some theories, these tiny primordial black holes would have formed in the violence of the big bang itself. Depending on what mass they were born with, they could be evaporating today in bursts of gamma rays through a process called Hawking radiation.

Cosmology - Keep up with the latest ideas in our special report.

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 8 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

Will Hawking Radiation Make Micro Black Holes Evaporate

By Jtankers

Wed May 28 00:56:00 BST 2008

It is important to know if Micro Black Holes evaporate, because scientists discovered a few years ago that Micro Black Holes may be created by the Large Hadron Collider due to begin operations later this year.

Most physicists in the past were taught Dr. Hawkings theory that micro black holes might evaporate, but recently this theory has been strongly disputed.

A: The black holes we know of grow at rapid rates, and the following PHDs and Professors of Math and Physics argue that micro black holes might also only grow:

* Dr. Adam D. Helfer: Do black holes radiate? “this prediction rests on two dubious assumptions…“

* “no compelling theoretical case for or against radiation by black holes“

* Dr. William G. Unruh and Prof. Ralf Schützhold: On the Universality of the Hawking Effect “Therefore, whether real black holes emit Hawking radiation or not remains an open question“

* Prof. V.a. Belinski: On the existence of quantum evaporation of a black hole “quote” “…the effect [Hawking Radiation] does not exist.“

* Dr. Adam D. Helfer: QUANTUM NATURE OF BLACK HOLES “…the correct picture of a black hole is very different“

* “…completely alters the picture drawn by Hawking“

Learn more at LHCFacts.org

REPORT | REPLY

Will Hawking Radiation Make Micro Black Holes Evaporate

By Reeler

Wed May 28 10:23:01 BST 2008

The Large Hadron collider is Satans Gateway to Earth, we already established that last week- have you seen the videos on you tube?

REPORT | REPLY

Will Hawking Radiation Make Micro Black Holes Evaporate

By Acoyauh

Wed May 28 16:21:11 BST 2008

"Established"? lol

LOL

ROFL LOL ROFL

lol

*sigh*

I love "scientific" debates like this.

REPORT | REPLY

Will Hawking Radiation Make Micro Black Holes Evaporate

By Deni

Wed Jun 04 18:47:38 BST 2008

Indeed :) Lol...

Yup..Gateway to Hell!

I wonder what is Tevatron then? The White Lodge? I can't believe people keep on buying all the sh*t papers write.

As for black hole evaporation, let's first prove there really are black holes and go from there. Because there are scientist that would dispute that too. And meanwhile, I can't wait for the LHC to start "gateway-ing" ROFL :)

REPORT | REPLY

Will Hawking Radiation Make Micro Black Holes Evaporate

By Paul Duncan

Sat Jun 21 14:24:48 BST 2008

Have they considered the what if part?

i'm no physicist, but if the little 1 decides it's a big 1 and starts pulling matter in then we will be up that creek with out that paddle.

REPORT | REPLY

Dark Matter

By James E Gambrell

Thu May 29 01:03:36 BST 2008

Is dark matter expected to relate to dark energy in accordance with Einstein's relativity (E=MC squared)? James E Gambrell

REPORT | REPLY

Dark Matter Trick Revealed

By Tissa Perera

Sat May 31 01:32:45 BST 2008

This comment has been found to be in breach of our terms of use and has been removed.

REPORT | REPLY

There are 8 comments on 2 pages
1  | 
2
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine