Subscribe to New Scientist magazine
Sputnik's Legacy
ARTICLE

Magnets help spacecraft fly in formation

Movie Camera
  • 19:46 06 May 2008
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • David Shiga
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
A computer animation illustrates how electromagnets can keep spacecraft in formation (Benjamin Schweighart/MIT-SSL)
Experiments at the MIT Space Systems Laboratory show that by varying the current running through superconducting coils, mock spacecraft can be made to attract, repel, and move sideways relative to each other (Courtesy of MIT-SSL)
Mock spacecraft equipped with electromagnets return to formation following disturbances (Courtesy of MIT-SSL)
Electromagnets keep spacecraft in formation (Illustration: Benjamin Schweighart/MIT-SSL)
Electromagnets keep spacecraft in formation (Illustration: Benjamin Schweighart/MIT-SSL)
 

Superconducting magnets could help a fleet of spacecraft fly in precise formation without using up limited fuel reserves, two groups of researchers say. But others foresee problems with the technology.

Many proposals for groundbreaking space missions require multiple spacecraft to fly in formation, including NASA's Terrestrial Planet Finder, which would hunt for Earth-like planets around other stars, and the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), which would search for ripples in the fabric of space called gravitational waves.

One way to keep spacecraft in the right arrangement is to use thrusters, which fire jets of gas to push a craft in the opposite direction. Unfortunately, thrusters can limit the lifetime of a mission because they rely on limited supplies of fuel.

But two groups of researchers are developing a technology that replaces thrusters with electromagnets.

In this scenario, each spacecraft in the fleet would be outfitted with coils made of superconducting wire. Running electric currents through the coils turns each spacecraft into a magnet with a north and south pole.

By adjusting the current, the orientation of the poles can be changed to either attract multiple spacecraft towards each other or push them farther apart, keeping them at the desired distance.

Solar arrays

A group headed by David Miller of MIT's Space Systems Laboratory in Cambridge, US, has been testing out the concept in the laboratory using mock spacecraft.

The test vehicles squirt jets of air down from their bases in order to hover nearly frictionless on a glass table to simulate floating in space. Using superconducting coils, the vehicles attract and repel each other, and even move sideways relative to one another, (see video at right).

"The biggest advantage is that you have no fuel that can run out," Miller told New Scientist. "The magnetic coils work purely on electrical energy, which you can generate through solar arrays that point at the Sun."

Cooling system

The superconducting coils would need to be kept at low temperatures in order for them to work properly – a temperature of 77 K (-196 °C) is required for one commercially available superconducting material, for example. This temperature could be achieved with a combination of insulation and an electrically powered cooling system, Miller says.

But there are some potential drawbacks to the technology, which is called electromagnetic formation flight (EMFF).

One worry is that the electromagnetic fields generated by the coils could interfere with electronics on board the spacecraft, says Fred Hadaegh, who heads NASA's formation flying efforts at the agency's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, US.

Miller counters that the magnetic fields do not need to be very strong, and are weaker than Earth's naturally occurring magnetic field. Some sensitive equipment could be wrapped in a thin layer of nickel-iron alloy called mu-metal, which shields against magnetic fields, he says.

Earth interference

For some equipment, though, shielding is not an option. Wrapping a camera in mu-metal would block light from entering it, making it useless. And shielding a radio antenna would prevent it from sending or receiving signals. But Miller says such devices could be protected by putting small secondary electromagnet coils next to them, tuned in a way that locally cancels the field from the main coils.

Earth's naturally occurring magnetic field could also be a problem for the technique. It would pull on the magnets, which could set the spacecraft spinning.

But a team led by Shin-ichiro Sakai of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) believes it has a way to overcome this problem. They recently presented their work at a conference on formation flying in Noordwijk, The Netherlands.

To prevent Earth's magnetic field from disturbing the spacecraft, they propose switching the polarity of the magnets several times each minute. This would prevent the spacecraft from building up any unwanted spin, they say, without interfering with forces between the magnets needed to keep the spacecraft in formation.

Military funding

Hadaegh's team is responsible for developing formation flying technology for NASA's Terrestrial Planet Finder, a mission that the agency postponed indefinitely in 2006, in part because of concerns that formation flying techniques were unproven.

He says his team studied EMFF for possible use on TPF. "As a technologist, I get extremely excited about seeing new technology advances, so I welcome any type of breakthrough ideas," he told New Scientist. But he said the team decided that traditional thrusters were a better choice for the mission.

TPF would reside far from any gravitational disturbances, at a spot in space where Earth's gravity balances that of the Sun. In this quiet zone, very little fuel would actually be needed for the thrusters to maintain the spacecraft formation, he says. And he says he is not satisfied that problems with EMFF like the need for shielding have been solved.

Still, the concept is promising enough that the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is funding the MIT group to develop it for possible use in a project called F6. That project aims to create clusters of little spacecraft that can collectively do everything a single, large satellite can.

Sputnik’s Legacy - Learn more about humanity’s first 50 years in space in our special report.

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 17 comments on 3 pages
1  | 
2  | 
3
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

Formation Flying

By Don Jennings

Tue May 06 22:01:36 BST 2008

I wonder how far apart they can be and still be controlled and how accurately can they be controlled at any distance, close or far. If the field is only about a gauss, I don't see why anyone would be concerned about electronics, they make it sound like its in a 10 tesla field or something. Consider this: satellites in LEO are ALREADY in a one gauss field or so, and none of those electronic packages are in any particular danger.

REPORT | REPLY

Space Travel

By Mr Boldly Go. . .

Wed May 07 02:06:39 BST 2008

I FEEL THAT TRADITIONAL THRUSTERS AND BURNERS ARE VERY ARCHAIC. It's old technology and i think its time to rethink our old school form of space travel - i find i very frustrating we are still using rockets to boost a space craft into orbit - this is both very dabgerous and outdated - syrely there are better means of space travel - i have read articles for ion drive, though this form or propulsion only works in the vaccum of space - come on nasa..... Lets make traveling to other planets as everyday and flying to another country.

REPORT | REPLY

Permanent Magnets

By John Dudding

Wed May 07 10:01:08 BST 2008

Using conventional techniques to switch permanent magnets on and off, or control levels, would :- save power, cryogenics, size and probably weight.

Have these guys got more budget than engineering skills?

REPORT | REPLY

Permanent Magnets

By C. Leonard

Wed May 07 10:36:57 BST 2008

Remind me again how you switch a permanent magnet off? If you're talking about conventional electromagnets then I see your point - but I'm guessing they can't get the field strength required with the amount of electrical power available from the solar arrays.

REPORT | REPLY

Permanent Magnets

By John Dudding

Thu May 08 09:23:27 BST 2008

You shunt saturated high coercivity magnets with low coercivity ones. The low coercivity magnets are then magnetised with very short duration magnetising pulses from a capacitive discharge magnetiser. (This provides high peak power from low constant power sources like solar cells.)

The low coercivity magnets will either short the flux from the Hi Coercivity magnets, or not depending upon their direction of saturation.

So by magnetising low coercivity ( low energy) magnets, you switch the Hi coercivity ( high energy ) magnets on and off.

Look up "Electro-permanent magnetic vices/chucks" used every day in industry

REPORT | REPLY

There are 17 comments on 3 pages
1  | 
2  | 
3
 | Next
 | Most Recent
 | See all

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
username:
password:
 help
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine